About 927,000 results
Open links in new tab
  1. 'Not element of' in Latin Modern - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange

    The Unicode character 0x2209 (\notin) does not seem to be included in the Latin Modern Math font. I know that I can load the Unicode character from another font, but I just want the output to look like …

  2. How do I write $\notin$ backwards? - LaTeX Stack Exchange

    Jan 7, 2013 · I write $P \\niton x$, but it does not work. How can I write the symbol $\\notin$ backwards?

  3. $x \\in A \\notin B$ - Mathematics Stack Exchange

    What you want is x ∈ A ∖ B x ∈ A ∖ B: the set A ∖ B A ∖ B is by definition the set of things that are in A A but not in B B. (An older notation is A − B A B; I don’t recommend it.) The expression x ∈ A ∉ B x ∈ A …

  4. How to negate a specific symbol? - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange

    10 A good compromise is usually \centernot (from the package centernot). But sometimes \centernot is good, sometimes it isn't. For instance, \centernot{\in} produces a poorer result than \notin that uses …

  5. Why do we assume the set $B = \ {x : x \notin x\}$ has any meaning ...

    Nov 18, 2025 · Dear Professor Lumsdaine, this is not asking for clarification of why the set B= {x:x∉x} is problematic. This is asking us to rethink the foundations. Why do we think that a set built by negating …

  6. If A\B ⊆ C ∩ D and x ∈ A. Prove that if x is not in D then x ∈ B

    Jun 17, 2017 · I must show that if x $\notin$ D then x $\in$ B. So far, I am thinking that, $$\text {x} \in \text {A }\land \text {x} \notin \text {B} \implies \text {x}\in C \land \text {x}\in D $$ So if $$\text {x} \notin …

  7. Show that the set of all $x$ such that $x \in P$ and $x \notin Q$ exists

    Continue to help good content that is interesting, well-researched, and useful, rise to the top! To gain full voting privileges,

  8. real analysis - If $A$ is a Dedekind cut, then we define $-A=\ {r\in ...

    Jun 5, 2023 · Set $\epsilon= |o|/2 = -o/2.$ Now choose a rational number $t\notin A$ with the property that $t-\epsilon \in A.$ The reason they gave is: Here we are relying on properties of a cut. In …

  9. set theory - Proving that for all natural number $n$, $n\notin n ...

    Jan 17, 2023 · Proving that for all natural number $n$, $n\notin n$ Ask Question Asked 2 years, 11 months ago Modified 2 years, 11 months ago

  10. elementary set theory - What is $x\notin x$ supposed to mean ...

    Jan 25, 2020 · However, what is $x\notin x$ even supposed to mean? Since any nontrivial element is at least an element of itself, the set $R$ defined as above can be nothing but the empty set $R=\ {\}$.